1chan


[Return]
Name
Link
Subject
Comment
File
Password (for post and file deletion)

Supported file types are jpg, jpeg, bmp, gif, png up to 10 MB.
All images must be safe for viewing at work.
1chan Helpline: (512) 953-3619


File: 1510535207300.jpg (661.49 KB, 1530x1023, uk_eurostar_capitals_third….jpg)

 No.4837

third rail > overhead

Look how neat it looks.

 No.4838

File: 1510542302579.jpg (1.54 MB, 2656x1494, 20170814_100842a.jpg)

I will feed you just because this is going to be a fun one (and on topic!).

>3rd rail

>can't handle more than 4000 kW or so
>trip over it and die
>implying overhead isn't sexy AF and better than something that tries to hide itself
bruh.

 No.4839

File: 1510608109652.jpg (430.14 KB, 1200x788, 20151210_542895.jpg)

>>4838
Overhead is indeed terrible for showing the rolling stock clearly on the photos which sometimes is really annoying when you are trying to find a spot where at least the locomotive could be shown behind all these 100500 poles per square meter.
BUT sometimes you do get some very nice ornament of all those poles, consoles or traverses. Especially when playing around with zoom.

But indeed the overhead wire would make for much longer electrical supply sections mostly because of much higher voltage allowed and is much safer for trespassers who want to take some pictures of trains (actually it's just plain fence with no gaps whatsoever which won't let you anywhere near any railway with the third rail installed).

 No.4840

File: 1510609256257.jpg (343.67 KB, 1200x800, 1034213.jpg)

>>4838
BTW why do you think third rail can't handle more than 4000kW? Russian type 81-760/761 "Oka" metro EMUs, for example, in 8 cars can pull as much as 6 megawatts of power from the third rail at full throttle. We don't have electrical supply sections as short as the train itself plus minimal safe distance in our metro, y'know.

Although SIX GIGAWATTS!!!1!!!1111 /1000 was deemed as a bit of an overkill after all so newer versions introduce two motorless cars per trainset.

 No.4841

>>4840
I had assumed current limitations from the British case. The Eurostar in the OP is very power limited on 3rd rail. I can't imagine how hot it'd get at the contact though.

 No.4845

>>4841
Not much of a problem with heat; the shoe is copper and low resistance, it won't heat up much even drawing rated load.

The rail can't get hot because it's got a large thermal mass and would dissipate down to ambient pretty quick.

The killer on 3rd rail is resistance. Over the length of the the section the voltage drop in the steel rail is significant at high power levels, limiting the current that can be drawn.

 No.4846

>>4838
You can't hide fatty bilevels. Only single levels can be sexy.

 No.4852

File: 1510732720659.jpg (473.54 KB, 1024x683, 18636121085_7e8d8b1751_b.jpg)

>>4840
>>4841
>>4845

dual-modes also only have 1 or 2 3rd rail shoes per power car, which for something like eurostar (2 power cars) gives 4 shoes total to draw the full hep/traction load of the train through. with gaps that might drop to 2 or 1 actually in contact with the rail, and all that current turns arcing into something destructive enough to damage the traction gear. that's why dual modes tend to carefully creep down 3rd rail, while MUs with one shoe on every truck can blast around as fast as they want.

 No.4872

>>4840
6 gigawatts is 6 billion watts or over 500 F40PH. I don't see sny trainset pulling that kind of power.

 No.4873

>>4872
2,515 F40PH locomotives



[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]